1. Are there innovations in education that should be in the College’s EDGE plans but are not? Has EDGE adequately introduced, encouraged and made possible significant changes in pedagogy, curriculum, and learning delivery?
   
   
2. How could St. Petersburg Junior College more effectively employ technology to support learning? In what areas has the EDGE process succeeded (or failed) to describe the new ways in which technology can facilitate the processes of learning, teaching and administration at the College?
   
   
3. Have the EDGE Committees adequately explored and redesigned organizational processes and functions? Are there organizational models that would better support future innovations at St. Petersburg Junior College in the age of digital global education?
   
   
4. Have the EDGE Committees demonstrated a clear understanding of the impacts of changing student demographics and technological advances of the environment? Have they explored and described adequately the skills, values, and educational preparation future employers will require of our students? Has EDGE adequately explored processes to achieve flexibility and nimbleness so that the College can more rapidly respond to educational opportunities of business and the community?
   
   
5. Has EDGE adequately addressed guidance and input from the learners themselves so that the College could be characterized as "learner centered?"
   
   
6. What important issues or opportunities has the EDGE process failed to address, and how will this impact the College?

Back to EDGE home page"