Compliance Certification
Home Core Requirements Comprehensive Standards3.1.1 Mission3.2.1 CEO Selection/Eval 3.2.2 Governing Board Control3.2.3 Conflict of Interest 3.2.4 External Influence3.2.5 Board Dismissal3.2.6 Board/Administration3.2.7 Organizational Structure3.2.8 Qualified Administrators3.2.9 Appointments 3.2.10 Administrator Evals 3.2.11 Athletics3.2.12 Fund-Raising3.2.13 Foundations3.2.14 Intellectual Property3.3.1 IE 3.4.1 Program Approval3.4.2 Continuing Education3.4.3 Admission Policies3.4.4 Acceptance of Credit3.4.5 Academic Policies3.4.6 Awarding Credit 3.4.7 Contractual Agreements3.4.8 Noncredit to Credit3.4.9 Academic Support3.4.10 Program Responsibility3.4.11 Program Coordination3.4.12 Technology Use3.5.1 College Competencies3.5.2 Institutional Credits3.5.3 Undergraduate Program3.5.4 Terminal Degrees3.7.1 Faculty Competence3.7.2 Faculty Evaluation3.7.3 Faculty Development3.7.4 Academic Freedom3.7.5 Faculty Governance3.8.1 Learning Resources3.8.2 Library Instruction3.8.3 Qualified Staff3.9.1 Student Rights3.9.2 Student Records3.9.3 Qualified Staff3.10.1 Financial Stability3.10.2 Financial Statements3.10.3 Financial Aid3.10.4 Financial Control3.10.5 External Funds3.11.1 Resource Control3.11.2 Environment 3.11.3 Physical Facilities3.12.1 Substantive Change3.14.1 AccreditationFederal Requirements   
Compliance DocumentComprehensive Standards3.2.10 Administrator Evaluation 
 

The institution evaluates the effectiveness of its administrators on a periodic basis.

 

_X_Compliance                      ___Partial Compliance                       ___Non-Compliance

 

Narrative

 

St. Petersburg College is in compliance with this comprehensive standard because all budgeted personnel are evaluated on an annual basis with evaluations designed to improve performance through reflection, feedback, and professional development.

 

Evaluation of Administrators and Professional Personnel

 

Administrative personnel receive a written performance evaluation in each year in accordance with Board Rule 6Hx23-2.10-Evaluation of College Personnel.  The purpose of the annual evaluation procedure is to provide the administrative and academic officers with information on the strong and weak points of their performance, as well as the improvements expected to encourage and support their professional growth and development.  The following areas are evaluated on the A&P evaluation form:

 

Excerpt from the Annual Evaluation Form for Designated College Staff (Professional, Administrative)

 

  1. List, according to priority, job-related goals and objectives you have set for the coming year.
  2. List, according to priority, job-related goals and objectives you have set for the evaluatee for the coming year.
  3. List, according to priority, job-related goals and objectives the supervisor and the evaluatee have mutually agreed upon for the coming year:  (These goals and objectives will form the basis for next year's evaluation.)
  4. Discuss your success or progress toward meeting the established job-related goals for the current year.
  5. Discuss your job-related success or progress toward developing new programs/projects/goals, which were not included as established goals for the current year, but which have been worked on.
  6. Professional Development Goals. Choose to complete either one activity from Category 1 or two activities from Category 2 (See list of professional development activities). Describe your activities for the applicable category and include the category reference, e.g., 2c. Appropriate supporting materials/ documentation may be particularly important for this area; be sure to discuss documentation and clarify. Also, please reference or describe the job related goal that the professional development activity addresses.
  7. Describe your efforts and successes in implementing the annual and long-term goals and objectives of the college's equity plan.
  8. Evaluatee's areas of strength (Including progress made toward professional development goals).
  9. Evaluatee's areas of needed improvement (Including professional development programs/activities completed)
  10. Overall comments.

 

Academic Program Directors also receive feedback from their Faculty through an annual Program Administrator Appraisal Form.  These evaluation forms are intended to provide informal feedback on interactions with Faculty and decision-making to the Program Directors and their Academic Provosts.  They can be used by the Campus Provost as supporting documentation for a Program Director’s formal evaluation.

 

                Excerpt from informal administrator feedback form

 

Use of findings to improve performance of administrators

 

These annual evaluations help ensure the continued competence and capacity of administrators and professionals to provide effective leadership of the College.  Administrators meet annually with their supervisors to evaluate their own performance, receive feedback, and discuss and finalize an individual professional development plan for the next two-year period.  Each administrator must complete at least one major and two minor activities described in District Board of Trustees’ Procedure P6Hx23-2.022 during the two-year period.  The Board of Trustees has provided an extensive list of professional development activities that Faculty, professional, and administrative staff can use to satisfy the College’s requirement for continuing professional development.

 

Continuing Professional Development Requirements

 

Category I (one activity required per two year period)

a)      Appropriate comprehensive educational experiences related to the Administrative/Professional responsibilities of the evaluatee subject to mutual agreement.

b)      Demonstrated completion of graduate or upper division undergraduate coursework, earning one or more official college credits in areas relevant to education, technology, or discipline-specific topics.  Non-related coursework must be pre-approved by the program director or supervisor.

c)       Demonstrated completion of coursework to meet licensure and/or certification requirements related to College employment.

d)      Taught graduate or upper-division undergraduate courses at a regionally accredited college or university, courses that are not part of the St. Petersburg College curriculum.

e)      Completed development of an existing course for online delivery, including completion of the online training course.

f)        Completed development of a new course.

g)      Completed or co-authored or fully revised discipline-related publications, including a text, workbook, article in a refereed journal, or materials related to instructional strategies.

h)      Completed one-year of service in an official capacity for a state or national professional organization, such as service as president, or chair of an on-going committee, i.e., participation that requires a significant amount of time.

i)        Participated actively in the College’s C & I Committee.

j)        Completed creative work, such as research or development of products, appropriate to the academic and scholastic setting that required a significant commitment of time and effort, as well as prior approval of the program director or supervisor.

Category II (two or more activities must be completed per two year period)

a)      Appropriate professional development activities related to the Administrative/Professional responsibilities of the evaluatee subject to mutual agreement.

b)      Demonstrated completion of a continuing education course.

c)       Demonstrated, with documentation, participation in professional activities, e.g., seminars, workshops, conferences, lectures.

d)      Developed a new presentation and presented it at a regional, state, or national professional organization’s meeting, with approval of the program director or supervisor.

e)      Published an article or a book review in a non-refereed professional journal or a newspaper.

f)        Demonstrated participation in juried art shows, including fine arts, music, or in community groups related to one’s discipline, e.g., the Community Band, Mainsail Art Show.

g)      Demonstrated completion of independent study, including instructional technology skill enhancement courses offered through Instructional Technology, SPD, or Corporate Training Services that are at least 8 hours in length.

h)      Demonstrated completion of Information Literacy training opportunities.

i)        Demonstrated completion of a grant proposal wherein a statement of need, program components to address the need, and an evaluation component are all presented.

j)        Served on a Collegewide standing committee or a campus committee, or special focus group, with prior approval of the program director or supervisor.

k)      Participated in an Industry Exchange Program.

l)        Engaged in community service activities that reflect goals or directions of the College, with prior approval of the program director or supervisor.

m)    Other activities, e.g., serving as an advisor for PTK or the Student Nurses’ Association, that are approved by the provost and the program director or supervisor.

 

Annual evaluations are retained in the individual personnel files of each administrative staff member and are maintained within the Human Resources Department.

 

References

6Hx23-2_10 Evaluation of College Personnel.doc
P6Hx23-2_022 Procedure-Professional Development.doc
Annual Evaluation Form for Designated College Staff.doc
Sample Administrator Evaluation.doc