|
The institution
publishes academic policies that adhere to principles of good
educational practice. These are disseminated to students, Faculty, and
other interested parties through publications that accurately represent
the programs and services of the institution.
_X_Compliance
___Partial Compliance ___Non-Compliance
Narrative
St. Petersburg
College is in compliance with this comprehensive standard because it has
sound academic policies that are readily available to all stakeholders
and interested parties.
St. Petersburg
College (SPC) has a strong commitment to educational excellence and the
academic policies adhere to principles of good educational practice, as
reflected in the College mission statement. All programs are in
compliance with Florida statutes and Florida Department of Education
Rules. Bachelor’s, Associate in Arts and articulated Associate in
Science degree programs comply with state common prerequisites
requirements, state regulations on common degree length and common
course state course numbering system conventions. The State
articulation agreement guarantees associate in arts degree graduates
admission and full transferability of general education requirements and
common prerequisites to a state university or public four year college
in Florida. The unique nature of St. Petersburg College as a four-year
public institution also has assisted in the creation of articulation
agreements with other community colleges and four-year colleges and
universities. For further information on the development and cyclical
review of degree programs and curriculum, see 3.4.1 and 3.4.12.
SPC determines good
academic practices through two primary avenues, researching best
practices and institutional data analysis. In the first avenue, Faculty
and administrative staff search for best practices through conferences,
grants, periodicals, and graduate course cohort studies, and incorporate
them through the normal development or update process of College
publications. These publications are reviewed annually by
administrative staff to incorporate innovations and best practices. In
addition, SPC determines the need for changes to academic policies by
monitoring academic data for problem areas.
The College’s
Governance Model ensures that new or revised academic policies and
procedures undergo careful review, discussion and agreement before being
recommended to the Board of Trustees for action. When a need surfaces
for a new or revised academic policy, the College forms a
cross-functional, cross-discipline committee with Faculty and
administrative staff to recommend possible changes to academic
policies. After the committees develop proposed solutions, they brief
these solutions to various standing councils, such as the Faculty
Governing Organization (FGO), the Provost Council, and the Cabinet, and
incorporate feedback. Academic policies are written into Board of
Trustees rules and procedures. The College publishes notifications of
such changes according to provisions of the Administrative Practices Act
(APA), including timely publishing for rule development and adoption.
Print and other media are created by the office of Institutional
Advancement, then reviewed and signed off by the content providers and,
ultimately, approved by the President of the College.
General Academic Policies. St. Petersburg College encourages Faculty to employ
research-based best practices to engage students in their education.
The Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education
developed by Chickering and Gamson (1991) are included in the Faculty
Manual and in the Pathways to eLearning course required for all Faculty
teaching online. SPC has the policy of disseminating other best
practices through professional development opportunities on Faculty
In-Service Days, in Title III and other grant workshops, through online
professional development courses, and through attendance at the annual
conference of the National Institute for Staff and Organizational
Development (NISOD), whose focus is teaching excellence and academic
leadership.
Academic policies
concerning course content, Faculty evaluations, grades, attendance,
final examinations, academic freedom, and academic honesty are stated in
Board of Trustees Rules and Procedures and published annually in the
Faculty Manual.
-
Course content.
The objectives and content of any course offered by St. Petersburg
College will be the same and will be taught so as to comply with the
course description. Course content requirements are found in the
College’s course outlines. Faculty are allowed to add objectives to
their syllabus, but must cover the course objectives from the
College’s course outlines. At the first class meeting, instructors
are required to present in written form vital information to each
class. This includes the instructor’s attendance policy, textbooks
required for the course, course objectives, and the grading policy.
The college provides an electronic syllabus template that has all
the required elements, including the course objectives pulled from
the College’s course outlines.
·
Grades.
A
student’s grade may not normally be changed except by the instructor who
assigned the original grade or the Student Grievances Committee, under
appropriate circumstances. The Committee on Academic Appeals (SP/G and
TS), the Student Appeals Committee (CL) will determine justification for
changing a student’s status in a course (i.e., to Withdrawn or Audit).
SPC monitors grade distributions and withdrawals to ensure abnormal
patterns are addressed. When a comparison across the Florida Community
College system showed SPC with a high rate of withdrawals, the College
formed a committee to address the issue and make recommendations for
policy changes. As a result of the new policy the College has
experienced fewer withdrawals and will continue to monitor these
numbers. In the most recent study, College preparatory pass rates
increased (45.4% to 50.4%) with withdrawal rates declining twice as much
as failure rates are increasing (Spring to Spring comparison). This
suggests that at least a portion of students who may have withdrawn in
the past were successful in completing remedial courses.
-
Attendance.
Regular class attendance is expected of all students. It will be
the responsibility of each instructor to insure that all students
are informed of his/her class attendance and excessive absence
policy in writing via the course syllabus. The instructor
determines when the absences of a particular student have become
“excessive;” however, Board of Trustees Rule has established
guidelines to provide consistency across the College.
Individual
instructors may publish and enforce more stringent attendance
policies than defined within the College’s guidelines.
Excerpt from Board of
Trustees policy 6Hx23-4.30 Class Attendance
|
All
instructors’ syllabi shall reflect attendance policies that define the
maximum absences or scheduled class hours based on the following
guidelines:
|
|

|
|
Meeting Times Per
Week Max. Total Absences
|
|
Five
(5) Up to 7
|
|
Four
(4) Up to 6
|
|
Three
(3) Up to 5
|
|
Two
(2) Up to 4
|
|
One
(1) Up to 2 |
|
Exceptions to the guidelines include
Science, Technology and/or Allied Health labs, clinicals or internships,
and courses that provide variable or abbreviated meeting patterns such
as blended, Weekend Computer Institute (WCI), express, modmester or
online instruction. However, in any case a clearly defined attendance/
participation policy shall be provided to students. |
-
Final examinations.
The giving of the final examination shall be left to the discretion
of the individual instructor, with the concurrence of the program
director or appropriate supervisor. With the exception of the
Collegewide Common Finals, students averaging an “A” or “B” may be
exempted from the final examination by obtaining permission from the
instructor. Final examinations must be administered at the time
indicated in the Collegewide Final Examination Schedule, unless a
change is approved by the appropriate program director and the
appropriate site administrator.
-
Academic freedom.
Faculty members are entitled to full and complete freedom within the
framework of established College Rules and Procedures. Faculty
members will exercise their academic freedom with integrity,
sensitivity, taste, judgment, and conscientious regard for the
rights of others and to the best interest of the College. Students
have academic freedom in the classroom in discussing their course
topic and in research of their course topic.
-
Academic honesty.
St. Petersburg College expects students to be honest in all of their
academic work. By enrolling at the College, students agree to
adhere to high standards of academic honesty and integrity and
understand that failure to comply with this pledge may result in
academic and disciplinary action, up to and including expulsion from
the College. As members of the College community, students also
have an ethical obligation to report violations of the SPC academic
honesty policies they may witness.
Distance
learning academic policies
are published on the eCampus Web site and include:
·
Online
student code of conduct.
ECampus
advises students that
the practices of courtesy and respect
that apply in the ordinary classroom may actually require more attention
in a distance learning venue. Guidelines include getting involved in
the course, being persistent, sharing tips and questions, thinking
before pushing Send, considering the context, asking for feedback,
acting with respect and integrity, and recognizing consequences of not
following the online code of ethics.
Service standards.
The College expects the instructor to meet the following standards
unless specific alternate expectations are provided to the student.
Ecampus
Program Directors monitor adherence to the standards through periodic
scans of courses. Results from Student Surveys of Instruction last
Spring indicate a mean of 6.04 on a 7-point scale for Faculty members
communicating effectively, 6.12 for
providing information to help students
determine their grades,
and 6.16 for students’ feeling there was sufficient interaction with the
instructor and other students.
|
Standard |
Service |
|
Initial contact via Web site by
instructor |
Within 2 days of the start of class |
|
Response to voicemail by instructor |
Within 24 hours 5 of 7 days a week at
the instructor's discretion as specified in the course syllabus |
|
Response to email by instructor |
Same as above |
|
Individual assignment marked |
Within 7 days of due date* |
|
Exam marked |
Within 7 days of due date* |
|
Final grade |
Available on the online student System
(Webster) the day after grades are due. |
|
Routine updates from instructor to all
students in the course (via group email, discussion board, chat
room, or headers on the class home page.) |
At least every 7 days |
·
Proctoring for Distance
testing.
If students live outside Pinellas County
and are unable to come to SPC for testing, they must identify a
proctor that is authorized to conduct the test elsewhere, preferably
a National College Testing Association (NCTA) Proctor.
Proctors at off-site locations must follow the following procedures:
§
Maintain the
security of the test by keeping it in a protected environment.
§
Administer the
test in a secure, proctored setting that provides good testing
conditions for the examinee. Testing environment will be comfortable,
free from distractions, and visually monitored.
§
Verify the
identification of the examinee (Photo ID with signature)
§
Ensure the
security of test questions. Test questions shall not be revealed,
copied, or otherwise reproduced. All materials used by the student
during testing shall be collected.
§
Provide no assistance to the
examinee in answering the test questions.
-
Pathways to eLearning requirement.
In the Pathways to eLearning course required for all distance
learning Faculty, use of the
The Seven Principles for Good
Practice in Undergraduate Education
developed by Chickering and Gamson is reiterated, as well as
requesting that Faculty apply the Six Principles of Good Web
Design and the 15-step Accessibility Checklist.
-
Signature Courses.
A signature course is a "high enrollment" course that has been
developed by teams of full-time Faculty, administrators, and
instructional technologists to include the required curriculum from
the course outline and research-based online instructional
strategies. All adjunct instructors must use the signature course
as a basis for their online instruction. Full-time Faculty members
may choose to use the signature course as option to replace their
course. An instructor may embellish a signature course if desired
but may not remove content from the course. The signature course
ensures a high level of quality across courses with multiple
sections.
-
Online Mentoring Agreements.
Online Faculty
designers will receive additional pay for mentoring each new
instructor using their reproduced online course in the Electronic
Campus. Faculty mentoring can include collaboration in design,
teaching practices, evaluation, and continuous improvement. The
time spent in the mentoring relationship must equal a minimum of 32
hours.
Academic policies for underprepared
students. In accordance with
SPC’s open admissions policy, all degree-seeking students who do not
have an acceptable score on the SAT or Enhanced ACT taken within two
years of applying are required to take SPC’s placement test in reading,
writing, and arithmetic prior to registration. Test results are used
for course placement. Competency-based preparatory instruction is
required for students who score below the cutoff score established by
state of Florida. Students may not extend beyond three attempts in each
required course except through an academic appeals process based on
major extenuating circumstances. SPC is piloting a Smart Start extended
review course through the Title III grant to reduce the number of
preparatory courses students need to take. In the pilot of 18 students,
nine were able to skip one and one person was able to skip two of the
preparatory courses indicated by their initial test results. The course
has been institutionalized as a Lifelong Learning course, offered in the
Spring of 2006 on two campuses.
Academic
policies for disabled students
are found in Board of Trustees rule 6Hx23-4.021. Students and
prospective students requesting accommodations in their academic work at
St. Petersburg College (SPC) must present appropriate documentation. It
is the student’s responsibility to request services supported in the
documentation (such as tutoring or note taking). Auxiliary aids to
assist disabled students are available in the form of note takers,
readers, tutors, interpreters, and extended examination time. Tape
recorders, calculators and spell checkers are permitted in class with
proper documentation of need. Disabled students are provided with early
registration opportunities as well as counseling and advisement in
advance of registration time frames. 6,887 disabled students availed
themselves of the wide variety of services offered at St. Petersburg
College in 2002-2003, 7,112 students in 2003-2004, and 6,494 students in
2004-2005. For more information on services for disabled students, see
2.10.
Availability of
policies
Prospective
students may secure information on academic policies from a variety of
sources and media: MySPC interface on the College Web site, the College
Catalog, the Student Handbook, the Supplement to the Faculty and Student
Handbook, program brochures, and Schedule Booklets.
Excerpt from Student Handbook on
Academic Freedom

The College’s
primary online interface is the students’ MySPC, which offers ready
access to the College catalog and other sources of academic policies.
The online College Catalog and Student Handbook provide detailed
descriptions of academic policies relevant to students. The online
Faculty Manual provides detailed descriptions and links to Board rules.
Excerpt from Faculty Manual on
academic policies affecting students

College students,
Faculty and staff all have online access to the Board of Trustees Rules
and Procedures via the College Web site. Notices and agenda for Board
of Trustees meetings are also published in print and electronic form,
available for view by any student, staff member or member of the general
public. This process and the public hearing declared for such
considerations provide a thorough method for making policy
recommendation available to constituents both prior to and after formal
Board meetings and action.
The College
brochures are published semi-annually and annually in hard copy, CD-ROM
format and also available in a ‘live’ constantly updated format on the
College Web site. Program of study and curriculum information are also
available via the web-enabled PeopleSoft Student Information System,
online program and course databases and through an interface with the
Florida Advising and Counseling Tracking System (FACTS). The Student
Handbook is created each year by a Collegewide committee, with strong
student representation, with strong emphasis on relevant academic and
student information, in a format conducive to meeting student interest
and need. The Supplement to Faculty and Student Handbook is used to
provide relevant, timely information on academic honesty, College rules
and required federal and state information on academic excellence,
college crime and retention and graduation. Both booklets are also made
available as a comprehensive CD-ROM and are also available in a ‘live’
version with links on the College Web site.
The Interactive
Student Orientation (ISO), individual orientations and advising sessions
are all utilized by student development staff to impart information on
student success, registration, drop/add procedures, appeals and academic
progress.
Changes to
academic policies. There is
a statement on the table of contents page in the college catalog,
student handbook, and other publications that forewarns students that
“The College … reserves the right to change any provision or requirement
when such action becomes necessary.” When that happens, the College
engages in an extensive education process to communicate the changes to
Faculty and students. For example, in Summer 2006 the College increased
the rigor of its class attendance policy to improve reporting for
Federal Financial Aid, in answer to a first-time deficiency in the
College’s state audit. The Board of Trustees Rule now requires Faculty
to maintain an attendance record in the College’s Course Management
System software, rather than a paper-based system, so the College can
instantly monitor attendance at the program and College level for the
purpose of reporting student status changes to the Federal Government
for recalculation of benefits, if needed. In this rule change, the
Board of Trustees also established Collegewide standards for allowable
absences and required Faculty to publish their specific attendance
policy in their syllabi. The rule change was communicated in a series
of mandatory meetings for Program Directors and Deans and at the
mandatory Fall Faculty Day at the opening of the Fall Semester. The
College also held extensive training for Faculty on use of the Course
Management System Attendance Manager. Students were informed of the
change through the syllabi and the online College Catalog was updated.
References
|